Celebrity Justice
Dennis Quaid Sues Drug Company

Actor Dennis Quaid and wife Kimberly Buffington have filed suit against Baxter Healthcare Corp., the makers of the drug Heparin.
Click to read the lawsuit!
The couple's newborn twins Zoe Grace and Thomas Boone were mistakenly given a massive overdose of the anti-coagulant drug last month while hospitalized at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in L.A. The Quaid's attorney says the twins "were very critical for a while," but appear to have recovered and "everything looks good." They filed suit because they want to prevent this from happening to any other children, Loggans said. The suit claims the Baxter is liable and negligent because the packaging of the 10 unit vial of Heparin looks almost exactly as the 10,000-units-per-milliliter vial of the drug.

Three children died in Indiana from a similar mix-up with the drug.

We're told that the Quaids have not sued Cedars ... yet. Just yesterday, Baxter issued a news release outlining the company's new "drug safety initiative" that promises to change the labeling of Heparin vials.

Cedars-Sinai released the following statement:

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center today announced a series of changes it has made in its medication policies and protocols since November 19, as well as immediate additional training of all nursing and pharmacy staff, as the medical center completed its preliminary investigation into a November 18 medication error involving three patients who erroneously received the wrong concentration of heparin (a medication used to prevent blood clotting) to flush their IV catheters.

The medical center's investigation found that preventable errors made by pharmacy and nursing staff caused the wrong concentration of heparin to be used.

A pharmacy technician failed to follow hospital policy of having another pharmacy technician verify the medication and concentration prior to removing it from main pharmacy inventory. As a result, the technician mistakenly retrieved a higher concentration of heparin (10,000 units per milliliter) instead of the lower-concentration heparin (10 units per milliliter) used for flushing IV catheters.

The higher concentration heparin was delivered to the satellite pharmacy that serves the pediatrics unit. A second pharmacy technician, working in the satellite pharmacy, did not verify the concentration of the delivery from the main pharmacy, as required by hospital policy.

As a result, the higher-concentration heparin was placed in a location in the pediatrics unit where the lower-concentration heparin is kept. The nurses who subsequently administered the heparin to the patients also did not follow hospital policy of verifying the correct medication and dose prior to flushing the intravenous site.

The error was identified later that day by Cedars-Sinai staff, who immediately performed blood tests on the patients to measure blood clotting function. In one of the three patients, the clotting tests returned quickly to normal. The other two patients were given protamine sulfate, a drug that reverses the effects of heparin and helps restore blood clotting function to normal. Additional medical tests and clinical evaluation conducted on the two patients found no adverse effects from the heparin or from the temporary abnormal clotting function.

"Although this was a rare event, and attributable to human error, it is also an important opportunity for the entire institution to explore any and all ways we can further improve medication safety," said Michael L. Langberg, M.D., chief medical officer at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

"On behalf of the medical center, I extend my deepest apologies to the families who were affected by this situation, and we will continue to work with them on any concerns or questions they may have. This was a preventable error, involving a failure to follow our standard policies and procedures, and there is no excuse for that to occur at Cedars-Sinai," Langberg said.

"Cedars-Sinai's reputation as a quality and safety leader nationally is due in large part to an organizational culture of continually improving our systems to minimize any chance of human error. Immediately following this incident we began additional focused education on medication safety to augment our regular training, and have implemented additional procedures and protocols for our pharmacy and nursing staff," Langberg said.

Among the actions Cedars-Sinai has taken in response to the incident:


► High-concentration heparin (10,000 units per milliliter) has been further sequestered in all pharmacies.

► Only saline will be used for peripheral IV catheter flush on all pediatric patient-care units. (It was already the practice on adult patient-care units to use only saline for peripheral IV catheter flush.)

► In addition to the existing policy of having designated high-alert medications (such as heparin) checked by two pharmacy staff prior to the medications leaving the main pharmacy, and then checked again by pharmacy staff in the satellite pharmacy, a new step requires a second check by pharmacy staff in the satellite pharmacy before they place high-alert medications in stock on a patient-care unit.

► In addition to these checks on designated high-alert medications by pharmacy staff, nurses will continue the existing policy of separately verifying medication and dose prior to giving high-alert medications to the patient.

► The existing ongoing training for pharmacy and nursing staff on medication safety policies and protocols has been augmented with immediate focused education on high-alert medications, begun Nov. 20, to reinforce the hospital's high-alert medication safety policies and protocols:

Starting on the evening shift of November 20:

● All nurses (approximately 1800) were re-trained on high-alert medication policies and practices, and were required to pass a written test on the material before they could resume caring for any patients.

● All pharmacy staff (approximately 200) were re-trained on high-alert medication policies and practices.

► The individuals involved in this incident were immediately relieved of duty pending investigation, and appropriate disciplinary actions are being taken.

Langberg said that Cedars-Sinai is also continuing to cooperate with regulatory agencies investigating the incident, and that Cedars-Sinai would make additional changes in policies and protocols if indicated by the regulatory agencies or any additional findings by Cedars-Sinai.

Reader Comments

(Page 7 of 15) Previous 15 Comments | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

91. The nurses should have checked the bottle before injecting it. The are suppose to double check medications EVERYTIME before they are given.

Posted at 5:47PM on Dec 4th 2007 by msalsharpton

92. First,,,,,,,,,,, The Bottles are Totally Different to me....and, I am not a trained Nurse........
Second..........Tops are different color from each other..................
Third.............Labels Clearly state real names not LIKENESS'
Fourth.........Sue The Nurses not The maker, because the drug works, when correctly given.................................
Fifth.........YOU LOSE QUIAD ......BASED ON FACTS....................

Posted at 5:50PM on Dec 4th 2007 by faygirl

93. Let me see............drug company comes up with a drug that helps to saves lives when used properly and administered by highly paid and trained health care workers. The drug is clearly labeled so that the "highly paid and trained" health care worker can give out as directed.

Highly Paid and Trained health care worker fails to do his job and the remedy is to sue the drug company. What am I missing here!!!!!!

No wonder businesses are leaving our shores and setting up overseas in China!!!

Wake up America!!!! You aint see nothing yet.....wait for Hillary Care!!!!!!!

Posted at 5:51PM on Dec 4th 2007 by NCDOG

94. i am a nurse, and i read labels over and over again (especially injectables) before giving....no excuse for this error, what nurse just goes by color of bottles and assumes that is enough is beyond me.
Not that mistakes can't, don't or won't ever happen is unrealistic...physicians, too, make mistakes, i have talked to a few drunk doctors while they are supposed to be on call, and have reported it.
On the other hand, Patients and patients families have absolutely NO CLUE as to how busy we are on the floor, and we absolutely do not have time to just chit-chat with you, what we do need from you is to not hold us up OR ruin our concentration when we are working, again, NO CLUE!!! please have questions ready and we will address your concerns briefly but concisely, before being pulled away to a completely different emergency situation.

Posted at 5:53PM on Dec 4th 2007 by jolene

95. Bottles don't look the same to me. Frivilous (sp?) lawsuit. Sue the hospital instead.

Posted at 5:54PM on Dec 4th 2007 by posters who write FIRST suck

96. The labels are approved by the FDA. There is a standard and the FDA approves the labels before the drug ever hits the market.

This drug has been on the market since the 1930s

Posted at 5:57PM on Dec 4th 2007 by FDA Commish

97. As a medical professional I am outraged that they are filing suit against the manufacturer. All of those little bottles look the same, it is our job to read it and recheck it 3 times before administering to a patient. The medical field is strict on this issue and I am sure the nurse was let go.

Posted at 5:57PM on Dec 4th 2007 by samantha

98. jolene, shut the F up

Posted at 5:58PM on Dec 4th 2007 by STFU

99. This error has occurred over and over again over the years - it's NOT a new problem. 15 years ago I was working in a neonatal intensive care and the same issue of bottle labels was a problem. Our hospital pharmacy developed a delivery system which required that two RNs sign off on the boxes of heparin bottles delivered into the unit before they were ever allowed into the cabinet. Two nurses had to inspect the boxes of heparin to make sure they were the 10 unit rather than 10,000 unit dosages, and they had to sign a quality control protocol sheet for each delivery. That stopped the problem in our hospital. Stopped it cold. No more problems.

If a protocol like that had been in place in the CA hospital, this would never have happened to the babies. I am appalled that based on the fact this problem has been around for YEARS, there hasn't been a nationwide hospital protocol developed like the one at my hospital. The 10,000 unit bottles should never have been delivered to the pediatric or neonatal unit.

I think the lawsuit is justified in that its goal is to make the drug manufacturers bottle and label the med in a significantly different way for each dose. Many lawsuits are served in order to make the defendent change something to prevent recurring problems in the future. No drug company will undertake the financially huge step of designing new delivery systems (bottles and labels) and expensive manufacturing changes unless compelled by the weight and force of a lawsuit.

I doubt seriously the first goal of the suit is to "make money" but is primarily to prevent the negligence from happening again.

In addition, the nurse who drew up the syringe with the med is clearly also to blame, as is the hospital for not having a safety protocol in place. From a practical nursing point of view, the two bottles ARE too similar, but that does not excuse the fact that the nurse made the mistake. Knowing those bottles were similar, she should have been EXTRA CAREFUL.

It's so sad to me to see that this problem is never-ending. It could have EASILY been prevented. The pharmacy delivered the wrong bottles, the staff stocked the shelves with the wrong bottles, the nurse used the wrong bottle. Three times the error could have been detected - three people who made mistakes. And babies died, and others were overdosed........

I'm sure the nurse feels horrible. While she is only one of many culpable, she is the final safety checkpoint that could have prevented this. This is every nurse's nightmare - a mistake that harms a patient.

Posted at 6:03PM on Dec 4th 2007 by A Retired Nurse

100. That nurse ignored the 3 R's, right patient, right drug, right dose! It was her mistake and hers alone.

Posted at 6:04PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Lauri

101. SO much of this is ridiculous I can't even stand it. I am a nurse...with Critical Care qualifications for over ten years...I will not go through all of my qualifications here, but I DO know what I'm talking about .

First of all, it is very difficult to sue a caregiver (nurse, resp. therapist, etc.). Just legally, it's pretty fruitless and difficult. Who needs to be sued is the hosptial. They can be held responsible for the ridiculous mistakes of the person who administered this drug. We are trained CONSTANTLY to avoid medication errors, and sadly these things to happen. Thankfully these two precious babies are alive. Obviously someone caught the error early, because I'm honestly surprised that it wasn't a fatal "mistake". It was blatant and ridiculous. There is a huge difference between Heparin 10,000u and Hep-Lock 10U. Hep-Lock is never used therapeutically...so the "caregiver" was obviously flushing a line of some sort (central, IV, etc.) There are tons of bottles in the hospital setting which look JUST like this. The difference? THE WORDS!!! Let's try reading before we put it in a preemie's line.

Bringing a law suit against the manufacturer is fruitless, because they can't change stupidity. I'm sure that Dennis Quaid and his wife are trying to make a statement...but they are barking up the wrong tree!

Posted at 6:20PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Gabi

102. Actually, Lauri, it is the 5 Rs:

Right patient
Right med
Right dose
Right time
Right delivery system

In addition, we are trained to check the med 3 times:

When we take it out of the drawer or off the shelf
When we draw it up or pour it
When we put the bottle/box back on the shelf

And we are trained to identify the patient twice before administering the med:

By asking them their name out loud
By checking their name bracelet

Med errors are a huge problem in hospitals! The nurse giving the med is the final safety checkpoint. No matter what has transpired before the med goes into the patient, the nurse is the one who has the final responsibility and opportunity to make sure the med is correct.

My heart aches for the nurse who made this mistake, but she alone is to blame because she failed to make sure the med was correct.

Posted at 6:14PM on Dec 4th 2007 by A Retired Nurse

103. #96 just doesn't want to hear the reality, think of your own job #96, the very best thing i can do for a patient is to give him/her my undivided, un-destracted attention for the amount of time i have. That is what i would like as a patient.

Posted at 6:20PM on Dec 4th 2007 by jolene

104. #54 (POCKETA) Are you serious? Do you know how many nerves you have in your body? So hospitals shouldn't place IV's "in side of wrist"? You probably shouldn't try to "give" medical advice until you are educated..or can at least do spellcheck.

Posted at 6:38PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Gabi

105. Yeah, the dennis quaid family is trying to make a statement annnnnnnnnnnnd make a little money while they're at it.
this guy hasn't been in a picture since the clinton administration.

Posted at 6:29PM on Dec 4th 2007 by ang

Previous 15 Comments | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments