Celebrity Justice
Dennis Quaid Sues Drug Company

Actor Dennis Quaid and wife Kimberly Buffington have filed suit against Baxter Healthcare Corp., the makers of the drug Heparin.
Click to read the lawsuit!
The couple's newborn twins Zoe Grace and Thomas Boone were mistakenly given a massive overdose of the anti-coagulant drug last month while hospitalized at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in L.A. The Quaid's attorney says the twins "were very critical for a while," but appear to have recovered and "everything looks good." They filed suit because they want to prevent this from happening to any other children, Loggans said. The suit claims the Baxter is liable and negligent because the packaging of the 10 unit vial of Heparin looks almost exactly as the 10,000-units-per-milliliter vial of the drug.

Three children died in Indiana from a similar mix-up with the drug.

We're told that the Quaids have not sued Cedars ... yet. Just yesterday, Baxter issued a news release outlining the company's new "drug safety initiative" that promises to change the labeling of Heparin vials.

Cedars-Sinai released the following statement:

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center today announced a series of changes it has made in its medication policies and protocols since November 19, as well as immediate additional training of all nursing and pharmacy staff, as the medical center completed its preliminary investigation into a November 18 medication error involving three patients who erroneously received the wrong concentration of heparin (a medication used to prevent blood clotting) to flush their IV catheters.

The medical center's investigation found that preventable errors made by pharmacy and nursing staff caused the wrong concentration of heparin to be used.

A pharmacy technician failed to follow hospital policy of having another pharmacy technician verify the medication and concentration prior to removing it from main pharmacy inventory. As a result, the technician mistakenly retrieved a higher concentration of heparin (10,000 units per milliliter) instead of the lower-concentration heparin (10 units per milliliter) used for flushing IV catheters.

The higher concentration heparin was delivered to the satellite pharmacy that serves the pediatrics unit. A second pharmacy technician, working in the satellite pharmacy, did not verify the concentration of the delivery from the main pharmacy, as required by hospital policy.

As a result, the higher-concentration heparin was placed in a location in the pediatrics unit where the lower-concentration heparin is kept. The nurses who subsequently administered the heparin to the patients also did not follow hospital policy of verifying the correct medication and dose prior to flushing the intravenous site.

The error was identified later that day by Cedars-Sinai staff, who immediately performed blood tests on the patients to measure blood clotting function. In one of the three patients, the clotting tests returned quickly to normal. The other two patients were given protamine sulfate, a drug that reverses the effects of heparin and helps restore blood clotting function to normal. Additional medical tests and clinical evaluation conducted on the two patients found no adverse effects from the heparin or from the temporary abnormal clotting function.

"Although this was a rare event, and attributable to human error, it is also an important opportunity for the entire institution to explore any and all ways we can further improve medication safety," said Michael L. Langberg, M.D., chief medical officer at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

"On behalf of the medical center, I extend my deepest apologies to the families who were affected by this situation, and we will continue to work with them on any concerns or questions they may have. This was a preventable error, involving a failure to follow our standard policies and procedures, and there is no excuse for that to occur at Cedars-Sinai," Langberg said.

"Cedars-Sinai's reputation as a quality and safety leader nationally is due in large part to an organizational culture of continually improving our systems to minimize any chance of human error. Immediately following this incident we began additional focused education on medication safety to augment our regular training, and have implemented additional procedures and protocols for our pharmacy and nursing staff," Langberg said.

Among the actions Cedars-Sinai has taken in response to the incident:


► High-concentration heparin (10,000 units per milliliter) has been further sequestered in all pharmacies.

► Only saline will be used for peripheral IV catheter flush on all pediatric patient-care units. (It was already the practice on adult patient-care units to use only saline for peripheral IV catheter flush.)

► In addition to the existing policy of having designated high-alert medications (such as heparin) checked by two pharmacy staff prior to the medications leaving the main pharmacy, and then checked again by pharmacy staff in the satellite pharmacy, a new step requires a second check by pharmacy staff in the satellite pharmacy before they place high-alert medications in stock on a patient-care unit.

► In addition to these checks on designated high-alert medications by pharmacy staff, nurses will continue the existing policy of separately verifying medication and dose prior to giving high-alert medications to the patient.

► The existing ongoing training for pharmacy and nursing staff on medication safety policies and protocols has been augmented with immediate focused education on high-alert medications, begun Nov. 20, to reinforce the hospital's high-alert medication safety policies and protocols:

Starting on the evening shift of November 20:

● All nurses (approximately 1800) were re-trained on high-alert medication policies and practices, and were required to pass a written test on the material before they could resume caring for any patients.

● All pharmacy staff (approximately 200) were re-trained on high-alert medication policies and practices.

► The individuals involved in this incident were immediately relieved of duty pending investigation, and appropriate disciplinary actions are being taken.

Langberg said that Cedars-Sinai is also continuing to cooperate with regulatory agencies investigating the incident, and that Cedars-Sinai would make additional changes in policies and protocols if indicated by the regulatory agencies or any additional findings by Cedars-Sinai.

Filed under: Celebrity Justice, Sound Bytes, Nurse!

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 15)Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

16. Dennis Quaid doesn't want to sue the hospital in case he has an emergency and needs critical care help again! DUH! Burn bridges and all that...

Posted at 3:43PM on Dec 4th 2007 by CedarsCyanideNurse

17. Why the hell would he sue the drug maker? The drug is safe if taken at a reasonable amount. He should be suing the hospital who overdosed his kids. WTF?!

Posted at 3:44PM on Dec 4th 2007 by John

18. although i think there should be a bigger difference (make a bottle red, not just a different shade of blue) The hospital should be held responsible. They were given instructions as to which bottle had what dose, and the nurse who administered the drugs should have double checked before it was given to the babies.

Posted at 3:44PM on Dec 4th 2007 by DINA

19. These labels have not changed for EONS, is a NEW nurse responsible for this mistake or was floated to a floor she was not trained for? Being a nurse myself, nursing school instructors repetitively stressed the IMPORTANCE of this drug, how it is metabolized, and lethal outcome if overdosed. Once again, the underpaid, overworked nurse strikes again. On what basis would Quaid sue the company? For developing a life saving drug? Duh......

Posted at 3:45PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Heidijo

20. Sorry, but this is not the drug companies fault.......even I can tell a difference and iI have never worked in the medical field..........look at the different colors and heaven forbid read it......it even tells you the dosage.......I guess reading was the hard part.....morons

Posted at 3:49PM on Dec 4th 2007 by SamanthaD

21. The blame is absolutely being put in the wrong place.
Someone administering medication SHOULD absolutely be the one held accountable.
Those bottles were not that similar. Trained staff should be to blame.

Posted at 3:50PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Mary New York

22. They'll never win! There's enough differences in the bottles. Sue the hospital - they're the ones who erred.

Posted at 3:51PM on Dec 4th 2007 by OC

23. The bottles look different to me. Maybe they shouldn't have complete freakin' idiots working at the hopsital. When it comes to giving people drugs, doctors and nurses should ALWAYS read the labels before injecting anyone..they shouldn't just think "Oh this drug is always in this spot on the shelf" and take it and use it. If he should be sueing anyone, it should be the hospital not the maker of the drug.

Posted at 3:52PM on Dec 4th 2007 by BubbleGumPrincess

24. I am a nurse. Reality here is that the drug companies are not who anyone ought to be suing. I honestly wish it was, I am saddened to tell you that it is my colleagues in nursing, along with the hospital pharmacy, who must take responsibility here. There are checks and balances in place from the moment a doctor writes an order, through the pharmacy dispensing and the nurse administering. This path of medication protocol, if followed, would have prevented this and similar medication errors. It's really as simple as that. Packaging, while certainly a discussion to be had, was not to blame here. The colored caps are Alert #1 and the different colors of label are Alert #2 and the most important Alert of all: nurses are trianed to read labels and compare to MD order, not once but twice, before administering Heparin to anyone, not just babies. "Heparin" versus "HepLock," Alert #4, would have been caught if Alerts #1-3 had been followed.
Now all that said, do I agree that even better labelling ought to come out of this? YES, I do think so. It would only add to the safeguards to be sure. But in the end, nothing absolves a nurse of administering the wrong medication, especially if the MD order was written clearly and correctly. It's part of the territory of the field of nursing to have to accept this responsibility, legally, morally and ethically. If the patient comes out unharmed, nurses can be disciplined without license loss by the way. So it is not always a career-ender.

Posted at 3:52PM on Dec 4th 2007 by JCinAZ

25. These labels have not changed for EONS, is a NEW nurse responsible for this mistake or was floated to a floor she was not trained for? Being a nurse myself, nursing school instructors repetitively stressed the IMPORTANCE of this drug, how it is metabolized, and lethal outcome if overdosed. Once again, the underpaid, overworked nurse strikes again. On what basis would Quaid sue the company? For developing a life saving drug? Duh......

Posted at 3:53PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Heidijo

26. Perhaps hospitals can start keeping the 10USP in one cabinet and the 10000 USP in another, far away from each other.

Posted at 3:54PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Lisa

27. NOTE to LAME LAME LAME... there are ALOT of moron attorneys on the planet. ALOT of them. I dont care WHO the atty says to sue... he is blatantly wrong. It is EASIER to sue for the label change but I expect nothing short of a laymen to not understand this.

Posted at 3:55PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Lisa

28. To DINA- WHY should the label be in a different color when the people who are administering it are EDUCATED in ADMINISTERING MEDICATION? It isnt like I am sending in a person off the street to start doing IV pushes in the NICU requiring different labeling. For the record the label is similarly colored but NOT the same in color or description. AND... the TOP of the bottle, is a different shade as well and again, these are not COLOR CODED for the average person. They are color coded to the drug they are. You cannot make HEPARIN lables a different color but YOU CAN change the shade to reflect dosage. The whole premise of the lawsuit and the comments on here themselves are because it is laymen commenting on medical standards and systems to which people are obviously not educated on and that is FINE SO LONG AS YOU ARE NOT A DOCTOR OR A NURSE. But if you are a doctor, or a nurse, well now we have a whole other issue. The suit, should be directed towards the hospital because 1- there is probably an error in the entry by the doctor, there is definitely an error by the nurse but the nurses culpability is limited based on what the physician wrote (and by the way ANY nurse who sees anything that completely out of whack would generally call the physician for clarification of the dosage so she is wrong either way) and finally, pharmacy and stock are culpable because there is NEVER a valid reason for HEPARIN to be in the NICU. There is never a reason for that dosage to be in the nursery. In the maternity wing perhaps for the mothers but no way can anyone validate the stock of the HEPARIN over HEPLOCk in that Nicu. NO way. This was a hospital screw up from top to bottom.

The Atty is a friggin idiot and the idea that you are going to change the color of the labels of the SAME FAMILY of medication and create a condition where they are going to be confused for OTHER medications that are NOT in the same family is the most dangerous ideology I have ever heard.

Posted at 3:55PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Lisa

29. ITA with #1 and #4. While I think that changing the lables on the two dosages will be beneficial, I ultimately think it is the accountability of the nursing/doctor staff to administer all medication carefully and accurately.

Posted at 3:57PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Firecrotch

30. too bad the DONT look exactly alike...they dont look anything alike in fact!

Posted at 3:57PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Jason

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Hot Tips

Email Alerts